Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla, delivered a dual message during an interview with Fox News, both defending his company against political jabs and confirming major developments in the ongoing violence against Tesla assets.

First, Musk criticized Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, who recently mocked Tesla’s declining stock during a Wisconsin town hall event. Walz joked that checking Tesla’s falling share price on his iPhone gave him “a little boost during the day.” Musk responded by highlighting the implications of such mockery, noting that Minnesota’s pension funds are partially invested in Tesla. According to Musk, the company’s stock struggles impact state retirees directly, making Walz’s remarks not just inappropriate, but detrimental to “his own people.”

Musk went on to address the string of coordinated attacks targeting Tesla vehicles and dealerships, which he characterized as acts of “domestic terrorism.” He confirmed that U.S. authorities have identified individuals responsible for organizing and funding these incidents. In his remarks, Musk emphasized the importance of focusing on the masterminds rather than solely the perpetrators, saying that the attackers on the ground are mere “footsoldiers,” while the real attention should be on the “generals.”

When asked directly whether the administration knows who is behind the attacks, Musk firmly replied, “We do.” He did not elaborate on names or potential charges but implied that law enforcement is pursuing the matter at a high level.

The incidents in question involve damage to Tesla property and coordinated efforts to disrupt company operations. Musk’s comments indicate a shift from reactive security to proactive accountability, with federal authorities now honing in on those orchestrating the violence from behind the scenes.

The revelations come at a time when Tesla faces mounting scrutiny, not only in the markets but also in the political arena. Musk’s assertive tone signals that he views both the stock criticism and physical attacks as part of a broader campaign against the company. By linking the pension fund’s exposure to Tesla stock, Musk turned the governor’s jab into a potential political liability, framing it as an insult to state constituents.

As developments unfold, the public and investors alike will be watching closely to see how both political figures and law enforcement officials respond to Musk’s pointed statements and the broader narrative surrounding Tesla’s treatment.